An otomatopiea.

Salut.

We’re both dedicated to the craft of taking an idea and pushing it to its breaking point.

Exploring all of its’ possible creative avenues, to create the best, most imaginative high-quality of that product there is.

An extended body of work can be found here.

In reality, this is a universe-forger. This tool was developed for creators to forge their universes, every aspect of existence--actors, settings, physics, items, entities all in a playground.

Fandom be damned and any worldbuilding application that is not well-rounded.

For this is a solution for the highl-detailed and creative minded, who enjoys consistency, interactivity, interconnectivity.

This is what we call our home.

The hard work of my interactive experiences comes from crafting literature that demands engagement, interaction, and a reward system of gaining knowledge.

I reference scnientific articles, consult field experts, and peform my own research and journalism to create generally informative and educational content.

My goal is to combine edutainment and give it a philosophicall, cool-edge and apply that to various artistic mediums.

Yes.

No.

Yes.

Yes.

I'm an creators' canvas, an artists' artist, and a writers' watercolors. I study a number of styles and assist with direction, branding, and establishment.

No.

Yes.

No.

Perhaps. There are a few rules you should know or respect going into this.

Consider growing out of my creative world and creating your own. We can not expect to continue producing new works by looking backwards at nostalgia and fanart.

Wearing our inspirations on our sleeve is commonground, but rarely do we Look to the real world for grounded-inspiration, to mature, and grow new wings.

Thank you for the thought.

No, I do not wish to have my works posted on Social Media. I have advertising accounts that do just that.

Yes.

Although, if you exhibit behaviours a self-proclaimed elite, be prepared to face ridicule.

I am interested in being as underground, and relatively unknown in the West, western media of pop culture, and known in African, Afro-American . I am not interested in catering to the mainstream, as I want my ideas to be expansive, detailed, and filled with depth.

I am not your poster-boy, I am not your savior.

My artwork exists as it is, and will be as it was.

The actors' & characters' words are theirs, and only ever theirs unless tampered or triffled with.

Literary work, non-fiction and fiction writing, are the freedom of expression through an creative medium.

This is a staple of culture. The representation and imagery of symbols are extremely important.

In two extreme examples, from the American Red Crosses' protected meaning in usage to the eurasian swatiska corrupted and appropriated by totalarist ideoleogues.

The meaning of symbols, imagery, and the ideas attached to them are subject to change based on how a culture, social group interactions, engages or tampers with them.

I categorize most fictional characters as archetypes, they represent a single-minded belief that serve a function in a world to tell a story.

Unless a character is defined by their ethnic background and social class, I would otherwise be seen as one of many experiences given in written form--which can validate a certain truth or experience in the world.

I personally believe Batman and Spiderman could ethnically be anybody--their archetypes, they wear masks or take on cowls. This is not so much the case for character like Black Panther or Static Shock who are intimately tied to their ethnic background.

Usually given a market, its' creators, and the type of audience it targets; the ethnic identity of those characters created will typically reflect their lives or world-view. They are vectors of representation or even caricatures--this can not be understated nor ignored.

While characters like Spongebob or Sonic do not hold an extreme cultural importance to how the world ultimately functions--they have limits to what they can seriously reflect in their worlds, given their art style and presentation--they are not human--and are limited at that expression.

A fictional character written with themes that tie to their social class, potrayal of character or challenges in ethnic background cannot be divorced from them.

This aspect of a character, has depth, and cannot be for some people; as they may relate to that experience depicted in written or visual form.

A Canon, and its' level of depth, depdening on its importance and sensitivity to certain themes will illicit a response from people.

Engaging with art and consuming it, is an agreement to acknowledge and listen to that critical analysis.

A mindset who tends to be "unopininated", or show "noncomittal" behavior, a "indifferent" attitude towards these concepts underlines a lack of creativity, open-mindedness or understanding of the world around them when engaging with art.

Do not get hung-up on it. You're livelihood is likely not threatened by it. It is inspired and fanwork. It only ever is that and stays inspired by that thought. Ignore it, block it, move on, and promote artwork you do support and makes you happy.

It falls upon the Creator to deliver a succesful potrayal of the character, based on their beliefs and development. If the creator is respected or holds a strong passion for the direction of his work, then there is nothing to worry about.

An imitation, caricature, slander, inversion, rewritting, or alternative take does rarely overwrites the original--there will be many interations or adaptions of a fictional character--but the oriign always exists as the centre point of the Canon.

I am interested in a idyllic goal of community that can come together around a arrangement of themes and ideas and promote social work or activism around it. To impact and benefit other social groups for a beneficial cause.

I consider fandoms cults. The word "fan" is a metalepsis, it descends from "fanatic". I am not interested in circle-jerks, self-deprecating or obssessive culture, or interpersonal conflict between micro-groups.

I have negative reservations towards the mindset that allows typical minor or teenager who believe they are entitled to "whatever" they may think they have a stake in within a fandom. Or the mindset of an adult who shares or peforms backwards actions who ultimately beenfits nobody in a group. Complaining, drama, culture-war, slander. Leave this lifestyle at the door when it comes to community--keep it in the culture that is web fandom.

I believe fandom is a somewhat infantilized, immature vesion of a club. I can not underestimate the power of creation it can give, but I will continue to avoid and often not recommend the often negative behaviours or mindsets they promote or attract.